Legal Opinion

State v. Heinrichs

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided September 18, 2013No. 12-2174PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTabor, J.

Cody Heinrichs told police he bought the product called “100% Pure Evil botanical potpourri” from a Waterloo liquor store. The State prosecuted him for possession of a controlled substance — specifically, synthetic Cannabis. He now challenges his conviction under Iowa Code sections 124.401(5) and 124.204(4)(u) (2011) on due process grounds, alleging the statutes were unconstitutionally vague as applied to him. Because an ordinary person could understand a chemical substance designed to simulate the hallucinogenic effects of marijuana would be prohibited under those code sections, we find no…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. DeVoss v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. United States v. Gerald Levy (89-5980) and Calvin Black (89-6099)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Racing Ass'n of Central Iowa v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. State v. MillsapSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Herman, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. State of Iowa v. Chung Chris LoCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2020
  4. State of Iowa v. Michael Jan MentonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
  5. State v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API