Legal Opinion

Dubbs v. Stribling & Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 27, 2000PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Friedman, J.

A real estate broker who, after complying with disclosure requirements, contracts to purchase her client’s apartment does not owe a continuing fiduciary duty to the client after the contract date. This action, which is rooted in a claim that defendants breached fiduciary duties to their client after execution of the contract, was therefore properly dismissed by Supreme Court.

Plaintiffs, both of whom are lawyers, were the owners of apartment 3-C in a building located at 139 East 94th Street in the Carnegie Hill section of Manhattan. Seeking more space, and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashland Management Inc. v. JanienNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Penato v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Northeast General Corp. v. Wellington Advertising, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Williams v. . HaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Newbro v. FreedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Ray v. RayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Hahn v. Stone House Props. LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  4. Hahn v. Stone House Props. LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  5. Walker v. Insignia Douglas Elliman LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API