Legal Opinion

Fair v. Murray

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County

Decided February 14, 1926No. 634Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrownson, P. J.

The writ in this case was issued in trespass, but,the statement of claim declares in assumpsit upon a contract, for a partial breach of which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages. The defendant’s brief states that no question as to the form of the action is desired to be raised, and as the form of action may, if this be necessary, be amended (Gould v. Gage, 118 Pa. 569, 563; Com. v. Press Co., 156 Pa. 516, 523; Collins v. Barnes, 130 Pa. 356), we may, in disposing of the questions which are raised, treat this as an action of assumpsit, giving leave to the plaintiff to amend.

The Practice Act…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Press Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Hart v. United States Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Collins v. BarnesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API