United States v. Reynolds

*119 Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

The granted issue in this case questions whether appellant’s pleas were provident. 18 M.J. 4 (C.M.R.1984). Deciding that they were, we affirm.

I

Appellant pleaded guilty at a general court-martial to conspiracy to commit larceny, robbery, wrongful possession of some marihuana, and impersonating a military policeman with intent to facilitate a robbery, in violation of Articles 81, 122, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 922, and 934, respectively.1 The robbery specification, as modified by the Court of Military Review’s opinion,2 recites…