Legal Opinion

Janesville Bridge Co. v. Stoughton

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1846PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court for Rock County. The Janesville Bridge Company filed its bill against Luke Stoughton, Guy Stoughton, Asa Blood, James M. Burgess, George Brown, and I. N. Wagoner, setting forth that in 1838, one Henry F. Janes obtained from the legislative assembly of the Territory a grant of a franchise to keep a ferry across Rock river, at Janesville, and in pursuance thereof, kept said ferry in operation, taking tolls for the same; that in the fall of 1838,…

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the District Court for Rock County. The Janesville Bridge Company filed its bill against Luke Stoughton, Guy Stoughton, Asa Blood, James M. Burgess, George Brown, and I. N. Wagoner, setting forth that in 1838, one Henry F. Janes obtained from the legislative assembly of the Territory a grant of a franchise to keep a ferry across Rock river, at Janesville, and in pursuance thereof, kept said ferry in operation, taking tolls for the same; that in the fall of 1838, Charles Stevens, of Janesville, purchased of said Janes the said ferry right and boat, etc., for $150, and kept said…

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

The Janesville Bridge Company filed its bill on the chancery side of the district court for the county of Rock, in which, it complains, that Charles Stevens purchased a ferry, right across Rock river at Janesville ; and in consequence of the increase of travel, he concluded to abandon his right, provided a charter incorporating a company for the construction of a bridge across the river at the same place could be obtained from the legislature. That an act was passed by the legislature, incorporating the said. Charles Stevens and seven other persons by name, and such others as might associate…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Providence Bank v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. Fleckner v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  4. Head & Amory v. Providence Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1804
  5. Corporation of New York v. MapesNew York Court of Chancery · 1822

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Menominee River Boom Co. v. Augustus Spies Lumber & Cedar Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Muscoda Bridge Co. v. Worden-Allen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Luthe v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Batzel v. Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of SpartaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API