Legal Opinion

McMinn v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 29, 1933No. 12,805PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE plaintiff in error, Laura A. McMinn, claiming under a defective chattel mortgage, sued to recover damages from the defendant in error Mark Harrison, common-law assignee for the benefit of the mortgagors' creditors, one of whom was the defendant in error the Davis Brothers Drug Company, which was an intervener below. Judgment went against her and she brings the case here for review.

[1] On February 15, 1929, one McAtee and his wife made Harrison their assignee by an instrument which, in form an irrevocable power of attorney, was obviously intended to operate as an assignment for the benefit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Damaskus v. McCarty-Johnson Heating & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  2. Glass & Bryant Mercantile Co. v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arapahoe Land Title, Inc. v. Contract Financing, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. The Exchange National Bank of Colorado Springs v. Raymond Hough, as TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  3. International Brown Drilling Corp. v. Ferguson Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. McMullin v. Keogh-Doyle Meat Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  5. McKelvy v. StrikerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API