Legal Opinion

Fox v. Starbuck

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1936No. 8396PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, President:

This suit involves the sanity of a grantor, and the performance of his grantee under a deed conditioned for care, support, etc.

On August 4, 1931, Peter Cales and Amanda, his wife, granted unto Mrs. Josie Starbuck (the daughter of Mrs. Cales by a former husband) all the real estate and personal property of every kind and character then owned by them, in consideration that the grantee “take and care” for them during life, furnish them with anything they might need, and bury them decently at death. The deed recited that the title to the property passed immediately to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Corns-Thomas Engineering & Construction Co. v. County Court of McDowell CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Fluharty v. FluhartyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Loar v. PolingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Azure v. HunterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Dils Motor CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State Ex Rel. Coral Pools, Inc. v. KnappWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Frasher v. FrasherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Cales v. FordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Manning v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API