Legal Opinion

Claim of Kantor v. William Armstrong Publishing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Assuming that the claimant stepped out of his employment when he went to get a drink of lemonade (Matter of Clark v. Voorhees, 231 N. Y. 14), he was within the course of his employment when ascending the stairway leading to his employer’s premises to perform the duties of his employment by a way provided by the employer. (Ross v. Howieson, 232 N. Y. 604; Matter of Kowalek v. N. Y. Cons. R. R. Co., 229 id. 489.) The award should be affirmed. All concur. McNamee, J., not voting. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Clark v. . VoorheesNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Matter of Ross v. . HowiesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Claim of Dubinsky v. KofskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934