Watts v. Watts
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, J.
This is a proceeding to establish, probate, and have recorded as a will a certain instrument of writing, which the reporter will set out in the margin. 1 It is contended by contestants, appellants here, that this instrument is not a will either in form or substance. The chancellor admitted the instrument to probate and record as a will.
It is elementary that the main distinction between a deed and a will is that the former must pass a present interest in the property purported to be conveyed, whereas a will does not take effect until after the death of the testator. We think it is evident that…
2Cited by14 opinions
- White v. InmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- McMILLAN v. GibsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Buchanan v. BuchananMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
- Ford v. HegwoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- Tanner v. ForemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.