Legal Opinion
La Brake v. Dukes
New York Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 2001PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Appellants brought a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102 to declare invalid the designating petitions naming respondents Ronald J. Dukes and Theresa Franke as the Democratic Party candidates for the office of Member of the Troy City Council from the Second and Sixth Council Districts, respectively, in the September 11, 2001 primary election. Appellants asserted that, in violation of Election Law § 6-132 (2), numerous signatures were witnessed by subscribing witnesses who resided…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Molinari v. PowersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- La Brake v. DukesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. PoqueeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Bray v. MarsolaisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- McGuire v. GamacheNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Rue v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Pisani v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.