Vick v. Beverly
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Clarke. Heard before the Hon. William H. Tayloe. The bill in this case, as amended, was filed by the appellee, Benton H. Beverly, against the appellant, Harriet E. Vick, on March 4, 1893; and sought to redeem an undivided one-half interest in a certain lot in the town of Thomasville, Clarke county, Alabama, from a sale under execution as the property of the complainant, and to have said lot sold for partition between the complainant and the…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Clarke. Heard before the Hon. William H. Tayloe. The bill in this case, as amended, was filed by the appellee, Benton H. Beverly, against the appellant, Harriet E. Vick, on March 4, 1893; and sought to redeem an undivided one-half interest in a certain lot in the town of Thomasville, Clarke county, Alabama, from a sale under execution as the property of the complainant, and to have said lot sold for partition between the complainant and the respondent, Harriet E. Vick. The facts of the case aré sufficiently stated in the opinion. On the final submission of…
1Opinion of the CourtHaralson, J.
1. Jt is made very plainly to appear in evidence, that Thomas Vick, the husband of Harriet E. Vick, the appellant, was the agent of his wife, so far as she"was related to it, in this whole transaction, and was cognizant of all facts connected with the case, and acted for her and in her behalf in acquiring whatever rights or interests she claims in the property in question, or growing out of it. Having acquired a title to lots 8 and 9 from his vendor, Beverly, the appellee, on the 18th of September, 1888, conveyed a half interest in lots 9 and 10 to Mrs. Graham. The deed under which Beverly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kilgore v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Moore v. GoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wootten v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919