Lynch v. Vincent
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, District Judge.
This is an action authorized by Section 216, Title 29 U.S.C.A. The complainants have sued for overtime wages as provided in Section 207 of said Title. It is claimed by them that they were employed by the dissolved corporation of which the named defendants are trustees. It is alleged in their joint complaint that: “Each plaintiff was employed by said corporation to do, and each did, the same kind of work, on different shifts. The usual shift of duty was from four o’clock p.m. to midnight, for Lynch, and from midnight to eight o’clock a.m. for Cotton.”
There was a further…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Earle v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- Flint Cold Storage v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Rose v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1947
- Walling v. General Industries Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1945
- First Stop Book Shop v. Matthews Book Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1979
- First Stop Book Shop, Inc. v. Matthews Book Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.