Legal Opinion

POTTER v. COZEN O'CONNOR

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01825Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ADAM POTTER, et al. : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs : : NO. 20-1825 v. : : COZEN O’CONNOR, et al. : Defendants : NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO, J. JANUARY 6, 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Adam Potter (“Potter”) and Moxie HC, LLC (“Moxie”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this action against the Cozen O’Connor law firm (“Cozen”), Anne Blume (a former member of Cozen) (“Blume”), and Anne M. Madonia (a current member of Cozen) (collectively, “Defendants”), asserting various state law claims, including…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API