Legal Opinion
United Mattress Machinery Co. v. Handy Button Mach. Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 5, 1953No. Civ. A. 1322PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This is an action to enjoin patent infringement on Mathewson patent No. 2,-421,280, granted on May 27, 1947, for tufting buttons and assigned to the plaintiff, United Mattress Machinery Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “United”).
United is a corporation of the State of Maine with its principal place of business in Quincy, Massachusetts. The defendant, Handy Button Machine Company (hereinafter called Handy Button), is a corporation of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois.
For many years United and its predecessor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- F. E. Myers & Brother Co. v. Goulds Pumps, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950
- Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. National Electric Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United Mattress MacHinery Co., Inc. v. Handy Button MacHine CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma v. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Central Manufacturing Co. v. B-M-K Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1957