Legal Opinion

Ross v. Ross

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 21, 2003No. 2002-C-2984PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

857 So.2d 384 (2003)

Susan Diane Starks ROSS

v.

Billy Wayne ROSS.

No. 2002-C-2984.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 21, 2003.

Walter George Bayhi, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Applicant.

Mark V. Marinoff, Frank J. Saia, Counsel for Respondent.

JOHNSON, Justice.

We are called upon to determine whether renewal commissions received by the ex-husband during the marriage on insurance policies issued prior to the marriage were the ex-husband's separate property subject to his declaration of paraphernality. The trial court and court of appeal found that the renewal commissions were separate property. We…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Milling v. Collector of RevenueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. Oliver v. Central BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Elder v. EllerbeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. Gueno v. MedlenkaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  5. Harang v. Bowie Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Faulk v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  2. Politz v. PolitzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Durden v. DurdenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. LA. STATE EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  5. Lanza v. LanzaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API