Legal Opinion
United States v. Paige
District Court, D. Montana
Decided April 22, 2005No. CR 04-007-M-DWM, CV 04-247-M-DWMPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
On December 22, 2004, Defendant Paige filed the Court’s standard form for motions to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, except that he typed in “and § 2241” at the top of the first page. Paige is a federal prisoner proceeding with counsel.
On January 18, 2005, based on cases cited by Paige in his motion, the Court ordered the United States to file an Answer. After an extension of time was granted, the United States filed its Answer on February 28, 2005 in which it raised as defenses Defendant’s alleged failure to exhaust administrative remedies and a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lopez v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hernandez v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Woodall v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Pimentel v. GonzalesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Jaworski v. GutierrezDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2007
- Bell v. WileyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2007
- Rosenstein v. WileyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.