Legal Opinion
Gill v. Columbia 93 School District
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2000No. 99-3807PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANA E. MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
The parents of Matthew Gill, a child with autism, brought this action against Columbia 93 School District (District) and the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (Department) under the Individuals with Disabilities Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (IDEA), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (§ 504), and state law to challenge Matthew’s education program. The district court 2 granted summary judgment to the District and dismissed the claims brought against the Department. The Gills appeal, and we affirm.
I
Matthew was born in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jacquie Albright v. Mountain Home School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Middleton v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- I.Z.M. v. Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Bradley v. Arkansas Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Special School District No. 1 v. R.M.M. Ex Rel. O.M.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.