Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 20, 1990No. 90-01284PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Kenneth Hicks appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary, grand theft, and escape. Initially, we were concerned that this pro se appeal was untimely filed. Hicks, in response to this court’s order to show cause, asserts that his appeal paperwork was handed over to prison authorities for mailing within the 30-day time limit, and therefore should be accepted as timely. Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).

Houston v. Lack involves an interpretation of the federal rules of appellate procedure. Most of the handful of state appellate courts that have passed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  3. State v. LeeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Counts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. HartsgroveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benbow v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API