Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Brown v. Russell

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 21, 1970No. Misc. No. 69-145PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MASTERSON, District Judge.

In this habeas corpus petition relator seeks relief on the ground that he was denied a fair trial because of the trial judge’s allegedly prejudicial comments on the evidence during the trial and in his charge to the jury.

Relator was tried in the Philadelphia Court of Quarter Sessions on May 3, 1966, before the Honorable Maurice W. Sporkin for rape and sodomy and was convicted by a jury. Relator then filed a Motion in Arrest of Judgment and for a New Trial contending, as he does here, that the trial judge unfairly commented on the evidence in his case. On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Billeci v. United States. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. United States v. KravitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  3. Commonwealth v. OttSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Russell Brown H-6127 v. Harry E. Russell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API