Legal Opinion
Duryea v. Town of East Hampton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 22, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to EDPL 207 to review the respondent’s proposed acquisition, after a public hearing, of portions of the petitioners’ properties, which include a private road known as "Navy Road.”
Adjudged that the petition is denied, with costs, and the proposed acquisition is allowed to proceed.
The petitioners are owners in fee of real property situated along the shore of Fort Pond Bay in the Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County. Included on each petitioner’s parcel is a private road known as "Navy Road,” which runs roughly parallel to the shore line of Fort Pond Bay. Dune Associates…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waldo's, Inc. v. Village of Johnson CityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Matter of BurnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Rodrigues v. Town of BeekmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Ross v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Ross v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
3Cited by5 opinions
- Township of West Orange v. 769 Associates, L.L.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- 49 WB, LLC v. Village of HaverstrawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Vitucci v. New York City School Construction AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Saratoga Water Services, Inc. v. Saratoga County Water AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- JC Penny Corp., Inc. v. Carousel Center Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2004