Legal Opinion

Coffin v. Day

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 18, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Bill to set aside alleged fraudulent preferences.

1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.

This case now embodies live creditors’bills, or bills in the nature of creditors’ bills, filed by creditors of Day Bros. & Co., to set aside certain alleged unlawful preferential payments made by said firm. The first case was brought by Coffin et al. v. Day et al., by a bill filed in the circuit court of Peoria county, in June, 1885, and removed to this court, and was for the collection of judgments at law recovered by the complainants against Day Bros. & Co., between February 13,1885, and June 2, 1885. The second case was brought by Dornan et al. v. Day et al., in January, 1886, for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Rice v. BarnardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
  3. McIntire v. YatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Peoria, Pekin & Jacksonville Railroad v. ReynoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Powers v. C. H. Hamilton Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Choy YinHawaii Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API