Legal Opinion
Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc. v. Lea
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 28, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 28404PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
This is a suit by Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc. (Consolidated), Sun Ray Drug Co. (Sun Ray), a division of Consolidated, and Bargain City U.S.A., Inc. (Bargain City) seeking damages from an insurance broker for alleged breach of duty in the placing of a policy of insurance. Defendants are Harry R. Lea and Roslyn T. Lea, co-partners trading as Harry R. Lea & Co. (hereinafter referred to as Lea or defendant)
*134Trial of this cause commenced before my late colleague Judge Allan K. Grim, sitting without a jury. Because of his untimely death before completion of the proof, no…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walker v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Hilton v. Federated Brokerage Group, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by6 opinions
- Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc. v. LeaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Eddy v. Republic National Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., and Rask & Associates, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Rask & Associates, Third-Party v. John L. Griffith, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Twin City Fire Insurance v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Metro Transportation Co. v. Controlled Risk Services, Inc. (In re Metro Transportation Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.