Legal Opinion

Schlott v. Transcontinental Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*340Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered May 17, 2006, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Muriel Schlott fell on steps constructed by defendant’s insured, against whom plaintiffs took a default judgment. Unable to collect payment, they forwarded a copy of the judgment to defendant. Within two weeks, defendant rejected coverage on the ground of late notice, in a disclaimer letter sent to both the policyholder and plaintiffs’…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pav-Lak Industries, Inc. v. Arch InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. QBE Insurance v. D. Gangi Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. 823 Second Ave., LLC v. Utica First Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  4. Kalthoff v. Arrowood Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Kalthoff v. Arrowood Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API