Legal Opinion

Ratinska v. Estate of Denesuk

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1983No. 82-2252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOARDMAN, Judge.

Appellant sought a declaratory judgment determining 1) whether the real property in question was owned by appellant as the surviving joint tenant with right of surviv-orship or by appellant and the estate of her deceased son, Roman Denesuk, as tenants in common and 2) any sums due either party by the other for mortgage, tax, and insurance payments made on the property. The trial court ruled that appellant and the estate were tenants in common and awarded appellant $3502.98 for tax and mortgage payments made on the property. Appellant challenges both rulings on appeal. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DAD, INC. v. MoringDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Johnson, Et Ux. v. LandefeldSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. Florida National Bank of Jacksonville v. GannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. LaPierre v. KalergisSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. Pierre v. KalergisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Countrywide Funding Corp. v. PalmerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. CHARLES WEISBLAT, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF SOL WEISBLAT v. JANICE FELDMANDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API