Legal Opinion

State v. Cotan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 16, 2022No. A174032PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

586 Argued and submitted December 30, 2021, affirmed February 16, petition for review denied June 23, 2022 ( 369 Or 856) STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RUBEN COTAN, aka Rueben Cotan, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CR69822; A174032

506 P3d 1184

Defendant was charged with, among other things, two counts of identity theft. He assigns error to the denial of his motions for judgment of acquittal on those counts, arguing that there was insufficient evidence of his intent to deceive or defraud. Held: The evidence of defendant’s intent was sufficient. Possession of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. SavastanoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API