Arnold v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
This case is similar in most of its features to Arnold v. State, ante, p. 1.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law. While the jury was being impaneled, they were asked by the defendant if they believed that he, about the time alleged in the information, was engaged in the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors to various parties; if they believed that a man who was running a beer club in a local option precinct was an immoral man; and, further, if they had any prejudice against a beer club run in a local option town, and if they had any prejudice against the beer club run in the city of Brownwood, with which the defendant is said to…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Boone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Edgar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Nite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
- State v. KnappSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Cross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.