Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Vaporis

Respondent contends that where a county bar association has made an investigation of alleged misconduct, and finds none, the matter should be closed, according to his interpretation of Gov. R. V(4).

Respondent then proceeds to question the use of a conviction of a misdemeanor, based upon a plea of nolo contendere, in a charge of misconduct warranting a suspension from the practice of law in Ohio. This court over a num*366ber of years has-established the. admission of a judgment of conviction in disciplinary cases.-' .See Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Moore (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 57; Dayton Bar Assn. v.…