Legal Opinion
Allan v. Sheesley
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1989No. 16420Published
1Opinion of the Court
447 N.W.2d 361 (1989)
Roger K. ALLAN and Nance Allan, Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
Carl J. SHEESLEY and Gregory C. Sheesley, Defendants and Appellees.
No. 16420.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
Considered on Briefs March 24, 1989.
Decided October 25, 1989.
Brad P. Gordon of Fuller & Co., Ltd., Lead, for plaintiffs and appellants.
Thomas E. Brady of Richards, Hood & Brady, P.C., Spearfish, for defendants and appellees.
MILLER, Justice.
ACTION
Roger and Nance Allan (Allans) appeal the trial court's dismissal of their complaint against Carl and Gregory Sheesley (Sheesleys).[1] We affirm.
FACTS
This matter…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Co. v. Felco Jewel Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Keith v. Willers Truck ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Geraldine G. Cannon v. Loyola University of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.