Legal Opinion

Garcia v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 29, 1985No. 64884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Justice.

A district court of appeal has certified the following question as being of great public importance: “Whether one can be convicted, although not sentenced, of a lesser included offense after he has been convicted of the greater crime.” Garcia v. State, 444 So.2d 969, 970 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution. We answer the question in the negative, but we hold that it is inapplicable to the instant case and quash the district court’s discussion of the law regarding lesser included offenses.

The state charged…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. HegstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. State v. PinderSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  5. State v. EnmundSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Foster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Savage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Rankine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API