Legal Opinion
In re Andrews
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 3, 1905No. 8,277PublishedCited by 10 opinions
In Bankruptcy. On review of decision of referee.
1Opinion of the Court
LOWELL, District Judge.
The question raised in this case concerns preferences alleged to have been given two creditors. In both cases goods were returned to them by the bankrupt in part payment of pre-existing debts. That the debtor was then insolvent was not disputed. That he knew he was insolvent I find as a fact, and that he intended to give a preference. His testimony was disingenuous, and I attach no weight to it. (See his account of the Hardy transaction, vol. *6001, p. 10 et seq.) The referee, who heard the witnesses, informed me in conference that he agreed with these findings.
It follows…
2Cited by10 opinions
- In re GaylordDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1915
- Marks v. Goodyear Rubber SundriesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Parker v. BlackDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1906
- Sundheim v. Ridge Avenue BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1905
- Marks v. Goodyear Rubber Sundries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.