Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Rugelis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 24, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was a sales representative for the employer until he retired on December 30, 1994. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant left his job for personal and noncompelling reasons and disqualified him from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. Claimant decided to retire…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of TothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claims of GuarneraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of ShabbirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of SahaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API