Legal Opinion

In re Mitchel

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 10, 1939No. 4051Published

1Opinion of the CourtGaRrett, Presiding Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the examiner which had the effect of denying all the claims (numbered 1 .to 16, inclusive, 20 and 21) of an application for patent for a combined churn and butter worker, obviously designed for use in plants where butter is produced in large quantities.

The brief-filed here by -the Solicitor -for. the Patent .Office succinctly states the issues of the case as follows:

This appeal * * * involves a question of division among three sets of claims specific to three different…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Edison Electric Light Co. v. United States Electric Lighting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
  4. General Electric Co. v. Hoskins Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
  5. Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. KalleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API