Legal Opinion

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 6, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gerald Woolwine Clark County Attorney 114 W. 8th Street, P.O. Box 885 Ashland, Kansas 67831

Dear Mr. Woolwine:

As Clark County Attorney you request our opinion whether funds derived from a forfeiture action under K.S.A. 60-4101 et seq. may be used to pay for additional sheriff's vehicles and equipment, improvements to the sheriff's office or jail, and law enforcement training and education.

K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 60-4117 provides in pertinent part:

"(d) Any [forfeiture] proceeds remaining shall be credited as follows, subject to any interagency agreement:. . . .
"(2) If the law enforcement agency is a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. Link, Inc. v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  3. Davis v. City of LeawoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. Kansas Highway Patrol ex rel. Settle v. 1985 Chevrolet Astro Van VinIGCDM15NOFB177466Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  5. State v. $6,618.00 U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API