Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Eisenman v. State

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2000No. 00-204Published

1Opinion of the Court

5 P.3d 542 (2000)

2000 MT 170

Brad D. EISENMAN, Defendant and Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Respondent.

No. 00-204.

Supreme Court of Montana.

July 6, 2000.

OPINION and ORDER

¶ 1 Before this Court is Eisenman's pro se application for writ of supervisory control and motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Eisenman grounds his application in our recent decision, MacPheat v. Mahoney, 2000 MT 62, 997 P.2d 753, 57 St.Rep.291, and requests that we remand this case to the District Court for fact-finding as we did in MacPheat.

¶ 2 The State responded to the application for writ of supervisory…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Garlotte v. FordiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. State v. GuillaumeMontana Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API