Marshman v. State

1. In regard to the ground of the motion for a new trial which alleged misconduct on the part of the jurors in separating while deliberating on the case, and in holding conversations with persons other than members of the jury, and in otherwise misconducting themselves, and on the part of the officer in charge of the jury in permitting this, the evidence adduced before the presiding judge on the hearing of the motion for a new trial was conflicting, and there was no error in overruling the motion as to said ground. Jones v. State, 136 Ga. 157 (71 S. E. 6).

2. In an act to regulate and…