Legal Opinion

Rabun Mineral & Development Co. v. Heyward

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 16, 1930No. 7745PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The case was previously here on a ruling on demurrer. For a full statement of the averments of the petition see 163 Ga. 399 (136 S. E. 272). Upon the return of the case to the trial court, the auditor appointed took the testimony and made report of his findings. Except in one respect only, the report of the auditor was confirmed and made the judgment of the court. The present bill of exceptions contains six assignments of error, one of which is based upon a refusal of the court to recommit the case to the auditor, the others being based upon the overruling of exceptions to the report of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fulton County v. AmorousSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Finn v. LifseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Rabun Mineral & Development Co. v. HeywardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walton v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API