Legal Opinion

Security Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Aiken v. Coleman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 1, 1985No. 22231PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

The narrow issue in this case is whether a court sitting in equity may use its broad equitable powers in ordering a lending institution to take a note and mortgage from a party not of its choosing. Under the facts and issues presented by this case, we hold that it was error and reverse the decision below.

In 1978, the Colemans executed and delivered a note and mortgage to appellant Security Federal. The mortgage contained a “due on sale” clause giving appellant the right to declare the mortgage due upon sale of the property. The mortgage expressly provided any waiver of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. United States v. Midland-Ross Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'n v. BraunSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Odom v. County of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rakestraw v. Dozier Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API