Legal Opinion

State v. King

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 9, 2017No. 20130223-CAPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

¶1 Defendant Levi Gene King appeals from his convictions for theft as a second-degree felony, theft as a third-degree felony, and failure to stop at the command of a law enforcement officer as a class A misdemean- or. See Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-404 (Lexis-Nexis 2012); id. § 76-6-412(1); id. § 76-8-305.5. Primarily, he contends that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to introduce expert testimony regarding the reliability of eyewitness identification. Because declining to introduce potentially harmful testimony was sound trial strategy…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  2. State v. HulseCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  3. State v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  5. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API