Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson Newspaper Corp v. Melino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1989Published

1Dissent

Mercure, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. The Court of Appeals held in Matter of Herald Co. v Weisenberg (59 NY2d 378, 380) that the presumption of public access extends to quasi-judicial administrative proceedings, which "may not be closed to the public unless there is demonstrated a compelling reason for closure and only after the affected members of the news media are given an opportunity to be heard”. This presumption of openness will be overcome only by statutory exception, expressed in specific language and strictly con*218strued (supra, at 381-382). The unwritten policy of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re CapocciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Herald Co. v. WeisenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Capital Newspapers Division of Hearst Corp. v. MoynihanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Herald Co. v. Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API