Legal Opinion

P.T. & L. Construction Co. v. Winnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 23, 1977PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Main, J.

Petitioner is the prime contractor for the construction of a *369portion of Interstate 88 and for other work on adjacent New York State highways. For contemplated use in the performance of its two contracts, the petitioner sought to buy soil for use as borrow in the construction of the highways. On December 28, 1973 petitioner signed a contract with respondents under the terms of which petitioner purchased "all of the soil in place” on the respondents’ land for the sum of $33,000. Petitioner was to pay this amount in four installments and the first two payments plus…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Giant Portland Cement Co. v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. J. C. Whritenour Co. v. Colonial Homes Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Strongback Corp. v. N.E.D. Cambridge Avenue Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Harsco Corp., Patent Construction Systems Division v. Gripon Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. In Re Regional Building Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  4. Plattsburgh Quarries, Inc. v. Palcon Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Pennex Aluminum Co. v. International Fidelity InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API