Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Studdard
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge.
Counsel for the plaintiff contends that a judgment on the railroads’ demurrers had been rendered prior to the first appearance of the case before this court, and, that since the railroads did not file a cross-bill of exceptions to the writ of error filed by the defendant Witcher, the judgment of the trial court overruling such demurrers is now established as the law of the case and is not subject to review. In support of this contention he cites cases exemplified by Carmichael Tile Co. v. McClelland, 213 Ga. 656 (2) (100 S. E. 2d 902), wherein it was held that, when a writ of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CoxwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Carmichael Tile Co. v. McClellandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Mann v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Savannah, Florida & Western Ry. Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Georgia, Ashburn, Sylvester & Camilla Railway Co. v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Jones v. GranthamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Oliver v. Fair Jewelers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. StuddardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.