Legal Opinion

Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1980No. Appeals, Nos. 1670 and 1736 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Co. and Home Insurance Company, both sometime insurers of Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company, have each appealed from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board awarding benefits to Michael Gr. Kalafut, some at the hands of Lumbermen’s and others of Home Insurance. We have consolidated the appeals for argument and disposition.

On March 24, 1975, Kalafut sustained an injury to his back in the course of his employment with Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company. Lumbermen’s was Pepsi-Cola’s insurer at the time of this injury and paid benefits to Kalafut…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. LoRubbio v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Sacks v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Franey WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Puhl v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Bechtel Power Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Puhl v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API