Legal Opinion

Farm Family Mutual Insurance v. Nass

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

William L. Underwood, Jr., J.

This case presents an interesting variation on New York’s long-arm jurisdiction concerning the interpretation of the phrase “transaction of business” contained in section 59-a of the Insurance Law.

Third-party defendant, Harleysville Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as Harleysville), moves for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint as to it (CPLR 3212) and that the court lacks jurisdiction of “the person of the defendant” (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 8).

The third-party action seeks a declaratory judgment regarding the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Blau v. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
  3. Future Ways, Inc. v. OdiorneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  4. NYC Medical & Neurodiagnostic, P.C. v. Republic Western InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
  5. AMT Capital Holdings, S.A. v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of Can.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API