State ex rel. Community Improvement Corp. v. City of Independence
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The principal error assigned in this case is that the Court of Appeals was in error in determining, under the facts and circumstances, that relator is not entitled to the relief prayed for. Therefore, this court is requested to make a factual determination as to whether the property involved is, as relator contends, unsuitable for single-residential purposes, and that the zoning ordinance is thus an unconstitutional deprivation of property without due process of law.
Respondent, however, contends that relator has not filed a bill of exceptions. If this is the case and such bill of exceptions…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Ford v. Ideal Aluminum, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- Beverly v. BeverlyOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
- Lewis v. Public Finance Corp. of Youngstown No. 3Ohio Court of Appeals · 1967