State v. Foster
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSix, J.
I write s*éparately to distance myself from the majority’s conclusion that the State’s comments during closing argument arising from Foster’s cross-examination of Detective Lee amounted to prosecutorial misconduct.
*213The prosecutor’s remarks were fair comment. Foster opened the door on cross-examination. For continuity, I repeat Lee’s cross-examination by Foster’s counsel:
"Q. The defendant waived all his rights?
“A. Yes, sir, he did.
“Q. I think at the time the defendant mentioned that he had an attorney, is that correct?
“A. Yes. He advised he had contacted an attorney, but he would go ahead and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State v. DorseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- State v. GaugerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- United States v. Vernon Dale Spivey, Danny H. Spivey, and Michael GorderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.