Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Neal

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 23, 2009No. 1070443PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Homer Osborne Johnson and Schurlock Holland (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the proponents”) appeal from a judgment entered by the Macon Circuit Court setting aside the Macon Probate Court’s admission to probate of Homer C. Osborne’s will (“the will”). We vacate the judgment and dismiss the appeal.

Facts and Procedural History

Homer C. Osborne died on July 17, 1973. On August 3, 2004, the proponents, who are two of Osborne’s sons, petitioned the Macon Probate Court to probate a will that had purportedly been executed by Osborne. The petition explained that the proponents did not know…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow DriveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Ex Parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Evans v. WaddellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Crutcher v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Christian v. MurraySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McGee v. McGeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  2. Ussery v. TerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  3. CMC Properties, LLC v. Emerald Falls, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. Briana Marquise Matthews v. State of Alabama (Appeal from St. Clair Circuit Court: CC-21-204; Criminal Appeals: CR-2024-0308).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2025
  5. Briana Marquise Matthews v. State of Alabama (Appeal from St. Clair Circuit Court: CV-23-59; CL-2024-0288).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API