Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beem v. McKune

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 27, 2003No. Nos. 00-3224, 00-3249Published

1DissentMcKAY, Circuit Judge

with whom SEYMOUR, HENRY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges, join.

I respectfully dissent. Pursuant to Kansas law as stated in State v. Williams, 250 Kan. 730, 829 P.2d 892 (1992), Petitioners were incorrectly charged, tried, and convicted of a crime. Williams, citing Kansas Statute § 21-3603 (in effect at the time), holds that when a defendant is related to his victim he “must be charged with aggravated incest and not indecent liberties with a child.” Carmichael v. State, 255 Kan. 10, 872 P.2d 240, 246 (1994) (emphasis added). It is undisputed that Petitioners should have been charged from the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API