Beem v. McKune
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1DissentMcKAY, Circuit Judge
with whom SEYMOUR, HENRY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges, join.
I respectfully dissent. Pursuant to Kansas law as stated in State v. Williams, 250 Kan. 730, 829 P.2d 892 (1992), Petitioners were incorrectly charged, tried, and convicted of a crime. Williams, citing Kansas Statute § 21-3603 (in effect at the time), holds that when a defendant is related to his victim he “must be charged with aggravated incest and not indecent liberties with a child.” Carmichael v. State, 255 Kan. 10, 872 P.2d 240, 246 (1994) (emphasis added). It is undisputed that Petitioners should have been charged from the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.