Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Kinney
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County-AndRew Allison, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.
This is a creditor’s bill to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance. It was filed April 25, 1892, and. alleges that, on August 15, 1891, G-eorge S. Kinney, G-. P. Lipscomb, and R. R. Reno, partners doing business at Nashville under the name of Kinney & Co., were indebted, by note, to Charles Nelson in the sum of $81,-546.69. On that day, the Kinney Distilling Company, a corporation that succeeded Kinney & Co. in business at Nashville, executed its notes in the stead, and in satisfaction of, the notes of Kinney & Co. These notes were indorsed by George S. Kinney, G. P. Lipscomb, and R. R.…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Bank of Hendersonville v. DozierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
- Bowery v. VinesTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
- Union Planters National Bank v. World Energy Systems AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Union Planters National Bank v. World Energy Systems Associates Nerco, Inc. North Carolina National Bank P & O Falcoal, Inc. Cooper Stevedoring Company, Inc. Western Alabama Mining Company Bertel Shipping Company, Inc. Johnstone, Adams, May, Howard and Hill and J.M. Jackson and Associates, Inc., Defendants v. Texas Chartering, Inc. And Hemmert International Corporation, Defendants- Texas Chartering, Inc., and Hemmert International Corporation, Plaintiffs v. World Energy Systems Associates, Inc. Wesa, Inc. Paul Liu Ed Bales Certain Funds, Letters of Credit, Assets, Accounts, Credits, Effects and Property, Tangible and Intangible of Union Planters National Bank and P & O FalcoalCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987