Legal Opinion

Walter v. Introcaso

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 24, 1947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ackerson.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Colie, Waohenfeld, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 14.

For reversal — Hehbr, J. 1.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Camp Clearwater, Inc. v. PlockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Butterworth v. MorganCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. PNC Bank v. AxelssonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  4. Township of Woodbridge v. PavelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  5. Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Ass'n v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API