Legal Opinion
Walter v. Introcaso
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 24, 1947PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ackerson.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Colie, Waohenfeld, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 14.
For reversal — Hehbr, J. 1.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Camp Clearwater, Inc. v. PlockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Butterworth v. MorganCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- PNC Bank v. AxelssonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Township of Woodbridge v. PavelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Ass'n v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.