Connolly v. COM., CAT FUND
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CASTILLE, Justice.
The issue before this Court is whether the Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund (CAT Fund) has a duty to defend claims that do not arise from the professional liability of a medical provider. Because we determine that the CAT Fund’s liability is limited by statute to those claims arising from the provision of, or failure to provide, medical services, we affirm the decision of the Commonwealth Court.
The facts in this appeal are not in dispute. In 1992, the executor of the estate of Lilia Semeraro filed suit in the United States District…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Fletcher v. Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Strine v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Stenton Hall Nursing & Rehabilitation Center v. Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Aria Health v. Medical Care Availability & Reduction of Error FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- St. Joseph Medical Center v. Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.